My only "workaround" is, in "Develop" under "Lens Corrections" select the Color tab, and toggle on "Remove Chromatic Aberration." You might also want to play with the "Defringe" settings (there are two: Purple and Green, and unless you understand these controls, just adjust the amount unless you see a definitive color to the edges of objects in high contrast areas. I've noticed, by inference, that with the G1X that probably not much is lost (but who knows until Adobe or another user who can be trusted come up with a profile) unless making critical prints of images. I also use the 5D MkII, the 5D MkIII, and now an EOS-M (an even more impressive, if advanced, version of the same kind of thinking as the G1X product strategy not surprisingly, there are not profiles yet for the 22mm EOS-M lens-or the alternative zoom-the camera comes with, but it was just released in the past month), and the first two, of course, have profiles for all the lenses I can put on them. Forward your supervisor's contact information and I'll be glad to convey my thoughts directly. Again, my apologies for seeming to attack you personally, but I found your response inadequate, which I already spent a lot of unnecessary words saying. But it remains as an enormous burden in time and effort, for indexing a mainstream product by another major vendor, on the Adobe customer. alas not efficiently usable in Lightroom) is "viable." It's real. ![]() I'll also apologize by relating that I am sorry, in advance, but I don't accept, still, that the notion of using the ponderous Adobe Lens Profile Creator (a similar, and far simpler, solution is offered by XRite and their Colorchecker app that creates profiles. I do appreciate the effort at providing a response and support, when the company does not provide the primary resources themselves for a "solution" (to a problem created by the absence of product, hardly the customer's fault). I was commenting on the conduct and character of this forum, which is determined by Adobe management, surely, not its people on the front line, like you. I can't get warm and fuzzy about a profit-making entity that's listed on the stock exchange. This is a business site, sponsored by Adobe (sorry, I think "community" has a different meaning). I meant nothing personal in any way shape or form. Second and third, I will apologize for two other reasons. The famous Adobe arrogance lives.įirst, I'm sorry because I should have made my point more clearly and succinctly. And stop telling us how we can do it, and how much you appreciate it when we do. You have the means, and you have the money for the resources to do what should be routine for a company the size of Adobe. It's a request for a profile of an incredibly popular camera (sixth in the top ten list of cameras receiving the most clicks for reviews and spec in the last five days on ). This isn't a request for an obsolete version of some arcane lens from an unknown Japanese vendor. We get paid for ours, and that doesn't include doing your work, in this instance. Creating a lens profile is not rocket science, but it's tedious and time-consuming. Even Apple releases updates on a much more robust product (a whole operating system) faster than you. Camera vendors turn out new firmware for newly released cameras faster than you update mature products. You've had the camera available long enough-available in Asia since February, and in the U.S. But we expect you to do it, with mainstream products (and they don't get more so than the Canon G1X). Of course we know we can create our own lens profiles, because you gave us versions of the tools that you use. that's thousands and thousands of dollars adding to their healthy bottom line earnings aren't what they were, but they're still near a billion dollars a year. We're not stupid, we Adobe consumers, who pay big bucks for initial licenses and then repeated big bucks for upgrades (I've upgraded Creative Suite five times since its original re-packaging as a suite. ![]() The redundant responses of Mr.Tranberry (the nature of which tends to leave me questioning the validity of the last word in his title if this is what a "Chief" is like, I wonder what the braves are like in the Customer Advocate team.) are what was called a non-response response, in the Nixon era (also the administration that invented the concept of "plausible deniability"), and in court would call for an admonition from the judge not to be non-responsive and answer the question.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |